Because of your particular interest in Continuum of Care programs, the National Alliance to End Homelessness is writing to make sure you know about a vote coming up on HR 32, a bill to expand access to the Continuum of Care programs to those who are currently living doubled up with friends and family by expanding the HUD definition of homelessness. The Alliance is strongly opposed to HR 32, as it aims to meet the needs of doubled up children in the worst possible way – by diverting CoC resources away from those who are literally homeless, sleeping in shelters or on the streets, and applying them to families able to rely on friends or family.
What’s Happening?
Tomorrow, February 7, the Insurance, Housing, and Community Opportunity Subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee will vote on HR 32, which would expand the HUD definition of homelessness to include people who qualify under several other federal definitions, including the one used by the Department of Education. Click here to access full text of the bill.
Why is the Alliance Opposed?
The legislation is well-intentioned but would have disastrous consequences. It would make an estimated additional 2.35 million children (and their parents) eligible to receive transitional housing and permanent supportive housing without providing any additional resources to serve them. We believe strongly in the importance of matching the most intensive interventions to the people with the most intensive needs. We believe that other affordable housing programs – including Section 8 and public housing – need to do a better job of serving people who are doubled up, but that the CoC programs are designed to meet the basic needs of the most vulnerable people who have literally no other place to turn and who have fallen through every single other safety net (both public and private).
As you all know only too well, there are insufficient resources to serve even those currently defined as homeless. Expanding program eligibility would hurt the most vulnerable people who literally have no roof over their head. Resources cannot be expected to expand to meet this nearly seven-fold increase in the number of children counted as homeless. As a result, every CoC dollar spent on someone living with family or friends is a dollar NOT spent on someone sleeping on the streets, in shelter, or in places not meant for human habitation.
In addition, as you know, under the HEARTH Act, all people who meet other federal definitions of homelessness are eligible for homelessness prevention assistance. The new definition has only been in effect for a month, and it is far too soon to throw out a new, compromise definition without seeing how it plays out.
What Can I Do?
Please contact your representatives’ DC offices and explain the drawbacks of HR 32 – especially if your representative sits on the subcommittee that will be voting on the issue tomorrow. Please feel free to share this one-page policy brief with congressional staff.
We know this is a controversial issue, but we are deeply concerned that this bill will have the unintended consequence of taking CoC resources like transitional housing and permanent supportive housing away from the people they were designed for – people who are literally homeless and have very intensive service and housing needs – by giving them to people who are currently in housing.





